Security posture
Server-side secret boundaries, protected access patterns, webhook verification, and documented production-hardening practices.
Trust Center
AgentFlow Enterprise is built as a secure AI RevOps infrastructure platform with documented payment lifecycle controls, Supabase-backed access boundaries, audit-aware operations, and a roadmap toward enterprise-grade governance.
Trust overview
The AgentFlow Enterprise Trust Center centralizes evidence-based information for B2B buyers, auditors, technical evaluators, and future customers assessing enterprise SaaS readiness.
Server-side secret boundaries, protected access patterns, webhook verification, and documented production-hardening practices.
Bounded qualification workflows, human review expectations, data minimization, and an evolving control roadmap.
PayPal subscriptions, server-side plan configuration, lifecycle webhooks, and reviewed invoice fallback paths.
Supabase-backed application data, provider-aware processing, privacy processes, and server-only privileged credentials.
Evidence-oriented documentation, lifecycle records where implemented, and a roadmap for exportable audit history.
Documented support channels, release validation, incident-response principles, and agreement-based enterprise review.
Security controls matrix
Status labels distinguish implemented capabilities from controls that require continuing verification, customer-specific configuration, or future delivery.
| Control Area | Current Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Implemented | Supabase Auth powers user identity and protected access where configured. |
| Tenant isolation / RLS | Implemented / continuously verified | Supabase Row Level Security principles are documented and should continue to be tested for tenant isolation. |
| Payment lifecycle | Implemented | PayPal subscriptions, webhook handling, confirmation routes, and manual invoice fallback are documented. |
| Webhook verification | Implemented where configured | The PayPal webhook ID and server-side verification must be configured and verified in Vercel. |
| Secret hygiene | Implemented | Secrets remain in Vercel, Supabase, PayPal, or provider dashboards and must never enter public source. |
| AI governance | Documented / evolving | AI qualification boundaries, human review, and data handling are documented as operational controls. |
| Audit trails | Partial / evolving | Billing and lifecycle events are recorded where implemented; exportable audit logs are a recommended next step. |
| Data retention | Documented | Retention, deletion, and export principles are documented and should be reviewed against each customer agreement. |
| Enterprise SSO | Planned | Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Google Workspace SSO are future enterprise controls, not active claims. |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 | Not certified / readiness roadmap | Formal assurance programs remain a future readiness path and are not represented as completed certifications. |
AI governance
AI lead qualification security depends on minimizing inputs, constraining outputs, preserving human review, and documenting which provider controls are active versus planned.
Planned enterprise controls
Provider selection, Azure OpenAI, and bring-your-own-key are roadmap items and are not presented as active controls.
Data protection and processing
The platform documents where application, subscription, and AI workflow data may be processed while keeping privileged credentials outside public and browser-accessible code.
Payment lifecycle trust
Commercial access depends on confirmed payment state or a reviewed manual onboarding process; payment logic remains server-side and provider-aware.
Operational readiness
AgentFlow Enterprise is deployed through Vercel and includes monitoring integration points, incident-response documentation, and release validation practices that must be configured and verified for each production environment.
Vercel deployment with environment-scoped configuration and server-side secrets.
Sentry and analytics integration points exist; production alerts and evidence require verification.
Documented triage, containment, communication, recovery, and review principles.
Lint, build, relevant tests, rollback, and redeploy procedures support release review.
| Plan | Channel | Response Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo | Standard support | Best effort | Suitable for independent founders |
| Growth | Priority review | Faster operational review | Suitable for growing teams |
| Enterprise | Dedicated commercial review | Agreement-based | Requires audit and invoice process |
Target response windows are operational guidelines and may vary until a formal enterprise agreement is signed. No contractual uptime commitment is represented on this page.
Due diligence readiness
The following evidence areas support structured review and should be validated against the deployed environment, current provider dashboards, and signed commercial terms.
Roadmap transparency
Roadmap items communicate direction, not delivery guarantees. Scope and timing may change after security, technical, and commercial review.
Current
Next
Future
Trust disclaimer
This Trust Center documents current controls, architecture decisions, and roadmap direction. It does not represent a completed certification, legal guarantee, investment instrument, or enterprise procurement approval. Formal enterprise commitments require a signed agreement, security review, and commercial onboarding process.